This post is an essay on sabermetric analysis of run scoring in baseball. If you're looking for insights into the Israel Baseball League in particular, please feel free to skip this entry.
People often discuss the relative importance to run scoring of onbase percentage versus slugging average. See, for example, here, here and here.
I'd like to try and shed new light on the question, using what I believe is a new analytic approach. Since I've only been analyzing baseball for a few months now and I'm not familiar with most of the vast sabermetric literature, it's possible, even likely, that someone's done this before. But I haven't come across it yet. Let me know if I'm repeating someone else's work. There are many open questions left to be addressed, and I'm writing up this very incomplete work in part to find out whether I'm barking up the wrong tree, or perhaps, as the British say, whether I'm just barking.
Update: Indeed, I'm not the first to come up with this. I seem to have essentially replicated the work of Prof. Carl Morris, described in detail in this impossiblyformatted text file. A layman's summary can be found here.
The basic modelConsider a simplified model of baseball run scoring, in which baserunning and advancing on outs are ignored. That is, no steals or pickoffs, no sacrifices or double plays or fielder's choice. This is obviously only an approximation of how the game works, but it's sufficient to demonstrate the principles involved. Besides, OBP and SLG don't incorporate those factors anyway.
In this model, every time a batter reaches base he either walks or gets a single, double, triple or home run. Runners already on base advance accordingly.
With a bit of simple mathematics based on probability theory, we can calculate in what fraction of innings different numbers of runners will reach base. For example, the probability that no runners at all will reach base in an inning is
(1OBP)^3. If OBP is 0.300, that means that in 34.3% of innings no runners will reach base.
Similarly, the chance that exactly one runner will reach base is
3 x OBP x (1OBP)^3. In general (without going into the derivation), the chance that exactly
r runners will reach base in an inning is
(r+1)(r+2)/2 x OBP^r x (1OBP)^3.
This chart shows the expected distribution of innings with each number of runners on base for different values of OBP (click to enlarge).
For example, with an OBP of .200, more than half of all innings have no baserunners. When OBP is .550, under 10% of innings have no baserunners, while over 15% of innings have one runner, a bit more have two runners, and a bit less again have three runners.
Even simpler is to calculate the average number of runners who will reach base per inning. Since
OBP = ROB / (ROB + Outs), a bit of manipulation reveals that
ROB / Out = OBP / (1OBP), so
ROB / Inning = 3 x OBP / (1OBP).
Here's a chart of the average number of runners per inning as it varies by OBP.
Now let's think a bit about how runs are scored.
If you think about this simplified model of baseball, you'll realize sooner or later that outs don't matter. We know there must be three of them in each inning, and they are the basis for our calculation of how many runners will reach base in an inning, but we don't care at all who gets out or when or in what order. Since no runners advance on an out or are picked off, we can analyze run scoring based solely on the number of runners who reach base and how they get there.
Four types of runnersSo let's start with the last runner in each inning. He can only score in one way: if he hits a home run. In real baseball, there are some other possibilities, including sacrifices, steals and errors. But in our model, since he can't knock himself in, there's no way for him to reach home unless he hits a home run. This is the case no matter how many runners preceded him in the inning, and no matter how many outs remain. So his chance of scoring is equal to the home run rate, defined here as the number of home runs divided by the number of runners reaching base:
HRR = HR / (H + BB).
What about the runner before the last? He can, of course, also score with a home run. But he can also score if the runner who follows him knocks him in. So if the last runner hits a home run or a triple, the runner before him will score. If the secondtolast runner hit a double, and the last runner also hits a double, he will score his teammate. In general, we can list all the combinations of two onbase events which will bring the first of the two runners home. If we wanted to, we could calculate their combined probability.
Similarly, the third to last runner in each inning can score in all the ways the second to last runner can score  he can get a home run or be knocked in by the following runner. But he can also score in more ways, since he can be knocked in by the second runner following him. Again, we can list all the combinations of three onbase events which bring the first of the three runners home, though the list starts to get a bit long.
What about the fourth to last runner in an inning? Simple: he scores! There are only three bases, so if three more runners get on base, he has nowhere to go but home.
This means we can classify runners into four categories: the last runner on base in an inning, the secondtolast runner, the thirdtolast runner, and all the rest. Each category has its own average score rate: for the last runner, his home run rate; for the secondtolast and thirdtolast, the chances of them either homering or being knocked in by subsequent runners; and for the rest of the runners, the score rate is 100%.
Now here's the kicker: It's not hard to calculate what fraction of runners should be expected to fall into each of the four categories. The only variable is the onbase percentage.
How many runners are the last in the inning? Simple: each inning with at least one baserunner has one runner who is last. Count the number of innings with one or more more runner and divide it by the total number of baserunners, and you have the fraction of baserunners who are last in the inning. The formula is:
Fraction of runners who are last in an inning =
Fraction of innings with one or more runner / average runners per inning =
1  (1OBP)^3 / (3 x OBP / (1OBP)) =
1  2 x OBP + 4/3 x OBP^2  1/3 x OBP^3Similar manipulations give us the fraction of runners who are second to last in an inning:
2 x OBP  14/3 x OBP^2 + 11/3 x OBP^3  OBP^4And third to last in an inning:
10/3 x OBP^2  25/3 x OBP^3 + 7 x OBP^4  2 x OBP^5And all the rest  the runners who are guaranteed to score since they are followed by at least three other runners:
5 x OBP^3  6 x OBP^4 + 2 x OBP^5We can graph these curves to see how the distribution of runners into the four categories varies with onbase percentage:
Two of these categories are not really affected by the slugging percentage. The fourth category of runners, of course, always score regardless of SLG. The first category, meanwhile, score only if they themselves homer, or they are advanced by some combination of steals, errors and sacrifices. Only the middle two categories of runners can be brought in to score by their team's collective slugging ability. They amount to a total of no more than about 42% of all of a team's baserunners, when OBP is around .400.
Another look at the same data:
Estimating scoring ratesIf we want to use these runner categories to estimate run scoring, we need estimates of the scoring rate for each of the first three types of runner. There are two ways to estimate scoring rates: analytically or empirically. Analytically, we can list all the possible sequences of plays which would allow each runner to score and add up their probabilities. Empirically, we can process game event logs and count how many of each type of runner in fact scored for a given league and/or team.
I haven't done either of these properly, except for a brief, imprecise empirical check using the IBL playbyplay files.
Meanwhile, for a backoftheenvelope estimate, we can assign the first type of runner  the last in the inning  a scoring rate equal to the home run per onbase rate (about 8% in the majors) plus something extra to account for steals, errors and sacrifices. Call it 812%.
The second type of runner can score on his own home run, or that of the runner following him, along with various combinations of doubles and triples  or even a single or walk, followed by taking the extra base on a double. His score rate is presumably at least twice the home run rate, plus. Call it 3045%.
The third type of runner can score in all those ways, or he can be knocked in by the a third baserunner. Call it 5075%.
I've prepared two graphs of the impact of the score rate on run scoring. The first shows the average runs scored per runner for different values of OBP, for a selection of widely varying score rates  the high scenario has score rates three times the low scenario. The second chart uses the same scenarios to compute expected runs scored per inning.
Overall, the impact of changing the score rate is higher when OBP is lower. This makes sense, since the higher the OBP, the higher the proportion of runners who are guaranteed to score. At onbase percentages around .300.350, tripling the score rate per runner type leads to approximately a doubling of overall run scoring. But raising OBP from .300 to just .400 is worth more in runs scored than tripling the score rate at an OBP of .300.
If we zoom in on the typical range of OBP's, we can see that the MLB's 2007 OBP of .336 and run scoring rate of 4.8 per 27 outs matches very closely the middle scenario for runner scoring rates. The actual estimate yielded is 4.89. I did nothing deliberate to make this match up; I discovered the correspondence only after plotting the graphs. It would seem to confirm the overall intuitions in the scoring rate estimates.
So, where does this leave us? With lots of open questions:

Empirical: What are the actual scoring rates per runner category in real baseball leagues? Do they yield correct estimates of run scoring when plugged into this approach?

Empirical: How do the scoring rates correlate against game events, or against OBP and SLG? What coefficients can we apply to estimate scoring rates for different teams or leagues?

Analytical: Can the formulas  specifically for the distribution of runner types by OBP  be simplified to yield a goodenough estimate with less calculation? (Though with modern computers and spreadsheets, it's not clear how important this is.)

Practical: Does this approach offer anything not available from
a more sophisticated Markov analysis?

Applications: Can this be modified to estimate the run contribution of a single batter?
If you're still reading, I'd love to know what you think.